I’m giving a talk (in Arabic) on 22 May 2019 at Human and the City for Social Research that explores Alexandria’s loss of public beaches and public spaces.
Click here for the Facebook event.
"Our inheritance was left to us by no testament" – René Char
This page shows upcoming events, once the event has passed, it might be updated to reflect the respective event that took place.
I’m giving a talk (in Arabic) on 22 May 2019 at Human and the City for Social Research that explores Alexandria’s loss of public beaches and public spaces.
Click here for the Facebook event.
I will be giving a lecture in Berlin on 10 May 2019 at the Volksbühne Berlin which will be based on the essay I wrote in January: On the Need to Shape the Arab Exile Body in Berlin. There will also be three short films shown by Syrian filmmakers and students from Bard College Berlin: Wafa Mustafa, Anas Maghrebi, and Rafat Alkotaini. As well as practitioners in political change will be present. One of the primary aims of the event is to critically engage with the essay, lecture, and films by endorsing or challenging the arguments put forth. Above all, the event is an experiment and exercise in thinking and action in times of gloom and uncharted waters.
The event is organised by Bard College Berlin and the below details and abstract is taken from the Volksbühne website.
Grüner Salon
Diskurs / Discourse
Englisch / English
Einlass 18:00 / Doors open 6pm
“Perhaps it takes an outside perspective, one familiar with the language born of the 2011 Arab uprisings and with the experience of so-called ‘failed’ revolutions to indicate new ways out of an impasse. Egyptian sociologist Amro Ali offers such a perspective: he recently penned an essay characterizing Berlin as an exile capital with enormous potential to be a meaningful political laboratory. The networks of exile have the potential to release immense intellectual and artistic energy into the city, yet the urge for fundamental political change that could emanate from it tends to fizzle out. The fragmentation and lack of political efficacy, which prohibit any capacity for action, raises the question: how could these Arab diasporic spaces overcome their paralyzing political despair and inactivity? Arab Berlin, after all, echoes what New York was for Jewish exiles fleeing Europe in the 1930s and 1940s or Latin American exiles making a home in Paris in the 1970s and 1980s.
In the first part of the evening, Amro Ali will present his ideas on the challenges facing the burgeoning of this political body, and propose a new type of beginning. A beginning for a political discourse in a new, revolutionary, but non-violent “language of consciousness” that respects the dignity of fellow human beings and seeks to enlarge their common space. A beginning through “poiesis” and “praxis” beyond the diaspora, to reach a place where an Arab exile body can enter a shared conversation with other communities.
For the audience, we will specifically invite people from very different political contexts familiar with practices of fundamental change.
In the second part, three young Syrian filmmakers and students from Bard College Berlin, Wafa Mustafa, Anas Maghrebi and Rafat Alkotaini, will respond by showing short films that shed light on the experiences of exile in Berlin – namely, political experiences with an existential dimension in which every human being that prizes thought can access. These artistic contributions might serve as examples of the despair that foments political stalemate and inactivity. They also might be seen as a counter-argument to Amro Ali’s ideas of agency, or even furnish what Amro Ali is asking for, a new beginning that is urgent yet cautious and aware of its vulnerability.
Real Talk is a new series at Grüner Salon that renders visible the political discourse of the young, resistance-oriented, democratic and activist Middle-Eastern diaspora in Berlin and provides space for its debates. This series aims to make evident the transnational realities and struggles between ‘here’ and ‘there’; ‘then’ and ‘now’, differences which Nationalism seeks to deny and erase, and which reveal themselves in the Diasporas. The talks serve as a platform to explore the diaspora’s own thoughts and reactions to these realities. The series in the Grüner Salon aims to create a space where Syrian, Afghan, Yemen, Iraqi and other experts in various discursive and artistic discipline can discuss and perform their work.
The series is a cooperation between Bard College Berlin, the Volksbühne Berlin and the German Council on Foreign Relations. It offers a mix of lectures, short-films, panel discussions and performances discussing themes such as the struggle for survival of the civil society in the Middle East; the re-claiming of political agency; disappeared and missing prisoners; the fate of women in the revolution; the political dimension of the (post-)traumatic; the experience of statelessness; and other topics related to the diaspora.”
de
Real Talk: zur Möglichkeit des politischen Neuanfangs in der arabischen Diaspora
“Vielleicht braucht es eine Außenseiterperspektive, um Wege aus der Sackgasse der politischen Verzweiflung zu weisen. Eine Perspektive, die allerdings vertraut ist mit der Sprache und den Erfahrungen der arabischen Revolutionen. Der ägyptische Soziologe Amro Ali beschrieb jüngst in einem Essay Berlin als Hauptstadt des arabischen Exils, mit dem Potential, ein Laboratorium für politische Aktivität zu werden. Die Netzwerke des Exils setzen in Berlin enorme intellektuelle und künstlerische Energien frei. Doch ihr Drang nach politischer Veränderung verpufft bisher. Die Zersplitterung und der Mangel an politischen Rechten und an politischer Organisation machen sie handlungsunfähig und werfen die Frage auf: Wie könnten die Räume der arabischen Diaspora die lähmende Resignation überwinden? Die Bedeutung, die Berlin heute für das arabische Exil hat, reicht ja durchaus an die Bedeutung heran, die New York in den 30er und 40er Jahren für das jüdische Exil und Paris in den 70er und 80er Jahren für das lateinamerikanische Exil hatten.
Im ersten Teil des Abends wird Amro Ali über die Herausforderungen und Schwierigkeiten sprechen, die es dem arabische Exil so schwer machen, eine politische Instanz zu werden, und er wird einen Neuanfang vorschlagen. Einen Anfang für einen politischen Diskurs in einer neuen, revolutionären, aber gewaltfreien „Sprache der Bewusstheit“, die die Würde der Mitmenschen respektiert und ihre gemeinsamen Räume zu vergrößern sucht. Einen Anfang durch „Poiesis“ und „Praxis“ jenseits der Diaspora, um dorthin zu gelangen, wo ein Gespräch mit anderen politischen Netzwerken und Kreisen möglich ist.
Im zweiten Teil werden drei junge syrische Künstler*innen und Studierende am Bard College Berlin, Wafa Mustafa, Anas Maghrebi und Rafat Alkotaini, mit Kurzfilmen reagieren, die die Exilerfahrung in Berlin beleuchten – als politische Erfahrung mit einer existentiellen Dimension, die jedem sensiblen Menschen zugänglich sein müsste. Diese künstlerischen Beiträge illustrieren einerseits die Verzweiflung, die der politischen Resignation und Untätigkeit zugrunde liegt. Sie könnten sogar als Widerspruch zu Amro Alis Ideen aufgefasst werden. Andererseits sind sie vielleicht selbst schon ein erster, drängender und doch vorsichtiger Schritt hin zu dem, was Amro Ali vorschlägt.
Real Talk ist eine neue Reihe im Grünen Salon, die den politischen Diskurs von jungen, widerständigen, demokratisch-freiheitlich gesinnten Diasporas des Mittleren Ostens in Berlin sichtbar und diskutierbar macht. Es geht um die transnationalen Wirklichkeiten und Kämpfe zwischen dem „hier“ und dem „dort“, dem “damals” und dem “jetzt”, die der Nationalismus auszuradieren sucht und die sich in den Diasporas zeigen. Die Serie gibt syrischen, afghanischen, irakischen und anderen Intellektuellen und Künstler*innen eine Plattform, um politische Themen gemeinsam mit Expert*innen in unterschiedlichen diskursiven und/oder künstlerischen Formaten zu diskutieren.
Die Serie ist eine Kooperation zwischen dem Bard College Berlin, der Volksbühne Berlin und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik. Vorträge, Kurzfilme, Paneldiskussionen und Performances werden die Abende prägen. Der Überlebenskampf der Zivilgesellschaften im Nahen Osten, die Rückgewinnung politischer Handlungsfähigkeit, die in den Gefängnissen Verschwundenen, die politische Dimension des (Post-)Traumatischen, die Erfahrung von Staatenlosigkeit, das Schicksal der Frauen in der Revolution – diese und andere, Diaspora und Welt verbindende Themen werden zur Diskussion stehen.”
I’ll be giving a talk in Madrid on 9 May, 3pm, at the Casa Árabe, as part of a conference exploring Europe as a melting-pot and laboratory of thought with a focus on Arab and Islamic contributions, past and present. I’ll be discussing Arab diasporas in Europe, political agency, and the emerging exile marvel in Berlin based on my recent essay. The talk will be in English but Spanish translation will be provided.
Abstract (Spanish):
Europa como melting-pot y laboratorio de pensamiento
A raíz de los levantamientos populares de 2011 en varios países de Oriente Medio y Norte de África, el continente europeo ha sido testigo de la llegada de ciudadanos árabes, ya sea perseguidos por motivos políticos, religiosos, escapando de la censura o de la crisis económica que padecen muchos países de la región. Las diásporas árabes en ciudades como Berlín, Londres, París, Estocolmo o Madrid han abierto espacios de libertad y creación nuevos. Pero, por otro lado, también se encuentran en un momento de desorientación y malestar frente al vacío ideológico creado por una postmodernidad fragmentaria y experiencias personales traumáticas. Otra experiencia es la de las generaciones que los precedieron, en las décadas de los años 60 y 70, como la de aquellos inmigrantes que llegaron después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial y que fueron pioneros en fraguarse camino en Europa, contribuyendo a hacerla más diversa.
I’m giving this philosophy talk (in Arabic) at AUC Tahrir on 27 April 2019, at 6pm, that will explore technology’s assault on the human condition, employing the works of German-Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han. This is part of the AUC’s new ‘Bel Arabi Falsafa’ project and the spring series is called ‘Philosophy and Modern Life.’ Entry is free and open to the public.
”The rise of the information age and digital revolution gave hope that immediate access to a plethora of sources, interactive and always visible, was within easy reach. In many respects, this was an encouraging development in places like Egypt, where libraries and access to books were rare or difficult to access for the public. However, it came at a price. In 1996, British psychologist David Lewis coined the term Information Fatigue Syndrome (IFS) after noticing that workers who dealt with vast quantities of information were suffering from a weakening of their analytic capacity, attention deficits, inability to bear responsibility and traits of depression. It was unimaginable that this rare condition at the time would eventually engulf, in various degrees, the entire world. With the inundation of information, boiling matters down to their essence has become an arduous task.
This lecture will employ the works of German-Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han who argues that on its own, a mass of information generates no truth. It sheds no light into the dark. The more information is set free, the more confusing and ghostly the world becomes. After a certain point, information ceases to be informative. It becomes deformative. Simply having more information and communication does not shed light on the world. Nor does transparency mean clairvoyance. Thinking is underpinned by discernment, discrimination, selection, and even forgetfulness – qualities that are frequently bulldozed in the online world.
However, this is not about fleeing from the digital realm as much as it is to ask the question: How do we reconcile the digital order with the terrestrial order? The German theorist Carl Schmitt celebrated the earth for its solidity which enabled clear demarcations and distinctions in which character is formed. Whereas the digital order equals the “sea,” where “firm lines cannot be engraved”, that is to say, no character. The smooth open spaces of the digital medium are without end, but a better appreciation of the world of shadows with its nooks, corners, crannies, and alleys that not only filter and impede the information pollution and trolls, but allows slowness, reflection, and mediation processes back into the thinking fold and the realm of authenticity.”
“لقد بعث عصر المعلومات والثورة الرقمية الأمل في النفوس بأن عالمًا من الموارد الوفيرة – المرئية منها والتفاعلية – قد أصبح بين أيدينا. وكان ذلك تطورا مشجِّعا من نواحٍ عِدة في دول مثل مصر، حيث كانت المكتبات قليلة وفرصة الجمهور في الحصول على الكتاب نادرة. لكن الثمن كان كبيرا. ففي عام 1996، خرج الإخصائي النفسي البريطاني ديفيد لويس بمصطلح “متلازمة الوهن المعلوماتي” (IFS)، بعد أن استرعى انتباهه أن العاملين الذين يتعاملون مع كم هائل من المعلومات يعانون من ضعف في القدرة التحليلية ونقص في الانتباه، وعدم القدرة على تحمل المسئولية، بالإضافة إلى ظهور أمارات الاكتئاب عليهم. ولم يخطر ببال أحد عندئذٍ أن تلك الحالة النادرة سوف تسري بين البشر في أنحاء العالم كافةً حتى تلتهمهم جميعا ولو بدرجات متفاوتة. ومع الإغراق المعلوماتي، صار تحليل أي مسألة من أجل الوصول إلى جوهرها مهمة شاقة.
الفيلسوف الألماني-الكوري بيونج تشول هان، الذي يؤمن بأن كتلة المعلومات وحدها لا يمكن أن تتولد من بين طياتها الحقيقة؛ فهي لا تشع نورا يبدد الظلام، بل إن كل سيل من المعلومات ينطلق باعثاً معه حالة من التشويش يستحيل معها العالم عالماً للأشباح، وفي لحظة ما ستصبح المعلومات عاجزة عن تنويرنا أو إعلامنا بشيء؛ بل سوف تنتقص مما لدينا من معرفة؛ فالحصول على مزيد من المعلومات، وتحقيق مزيد من التواصل لا يجعل العالم أكثر وضوحا ولا استنارة، ولا الشفافية تعني وضوح الرؤية، حيث أن التفكير يرتكز على الإدراك والملاحظة والتمييز والانتقاء، بل وحتى على النسيان – تلك عمليات يتم تدميرها والإجهاز عليها في عالم الإنترنت.
كما تتناول الندوة فكرة أنه رغم كل ذلك، فالأمر لا يُعد دعوة للهروب من العالم الرقمي، بل دعوة لكي نسأل أنفسنا: كيف لنا أن نحقق التصالح بين النظام الرقمي، والنظام الأرضي؟ لقد عبر العالم الألماني كارل شميدت عن أن عظمة الأرض تكمن في صلابتها، حيث رُسمت الحدود وَوضَحت الفروق، فصنعت ملامح شخصيتها المتفردة، بينما يترامى النظام الرقمي “كبحر بلا شاطئ”، يستحيل فيه “أن تحفر خطًا واحدًا”، أي لا شخصية له على الإطلاق، كما أن الفضاءات الشاسعة الناعمة التي يفتحها الوسط الرقمي أمامنا لانهائية، لكن إذا تيسر لنا أن نتذوق عالم الظلال بأركانه وزواياه وشقوقه المظلمة وأزقته الضيقة، إذن لتمكننا من تنقية المعلومات وصد الملوث منها، وقطع الطريق على الغيلان القابعة فيها، بل ولحظينا ببعض الفرصة للتمهل، والتفكُّر، والتأمل -الشيء الذي سيعيدنا إلى مساحة التفكير وإلى عالم الأصالة.”
Click here for the Facebook event
(This is a modified lecture of one I gave in Goethe Alexandria last November)
Eight years ago, Tunisia’s dictator Ben Ali was overthrown in a popular revolution that set off a chain of new political realities and possibilities of transformation in the Arab world. Much of that elation and momentum was eventually submerged under the inferno of counter-revolutions, crackdowns, wars, terrorism, coups, and regional restlessness. Only the original protagonist, Tunisia, considerably weathered the storm. However, rather than simply “moving on”, the seminar explores the long arm of the momentous events in how they shape the present spectrum: from the growing violent methods of paranoid regimes that sees a journalist like Jamal Khashoggi murdered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, to the Arab public’s heterogeneous ways of countering repression by, for example, adopting Egyptian footballer Mohamed Salah into the continuing, albeit increasingly weary, search for dignity.
Click here for the Facebook event:
Organised by the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES), Lund University and Forum for Africa Studies, Uppsala University, 17 scholars of African cities (in Zambia, Egypt, Ghana, Nigeria, Angola, and the Democratic Republic of Congo) will run a workshop titled ‘African Cities and the Materiality of Suspicion’, which will take place in Lusaka, Zambia, 9-10 December 2018. The purpose of the workshop is to compare experiences, discuss perspectives, and chapter ideas. Publication due out in late 2019 based on the workshop discussions.
Abstract:
“What is city life like when suspicion comes to underlie everyday interactions with the familiar world? What happens when the suspicion grabs a hold of you that the other passengers in the minibus is a band of armed robbers disguised as commuters, or that the person on the seat next to yours is a government intelligence agent? What do you do when you start wondering whether or not the person you bought your house from was in fact the real owner, or if the butcher put poison in the meat you are about to feed to your family? How does it feel to wonder whether the soundscapes created by public sermons are signs of piety or terrorists’ hidden agendas? What is it like to be almost entirely sure that the electricity company has tampered with the prepaid meter on your wall? Or to discover that the label on your supposedly genuine Honda generator uses a different font than the one your neighbour has?
This is an invitation to participate in a workshop on the materialities, affects, imaginaries, practices, social interactions, and experiences that form when suspicions of this kind come to besiege city life and contribute to an edited volume or special issue in a journal. The theme has grown out of the four organizing researchers’ experiences from Egyptian cities such as Cairo and Port Said, and from Jos and Port Harcourt in Nigeria. Here, long-term dramatic changes are transforming landscapes, relationships and networks, causing a general sense of suspicion to seep into ordinary interactions with familiar matters. There is a deep-seated notion that objects, people, relationships, society, or indeed the world at large, are not what they appear to be, and often, this world of mirages seems to be animated by concealed malevolent agencies.
Recent theory grown out of experiences of fast growing African cities highlights ambiguity as a fundamental condition of everyday life, as intricate webs of economic and cultural logics, value systems, interpretations and expectations, allow for the simultaneous existence of irreconcilable truths.
A shared observation by the four conveners is that suspicion thrives when the familiar emerges as a site of ambiguity – when things and experiences that induce normalcy, security or monotony, simultaneously provoke doubts regarding the true nature of things, people, and relationships. People are continually compelled to try to anticipate which potentialities will solidify into realities. The array of anxieties that emerge from these moments of suspense form a useful starting point for investigating suspicion.
Another observation by the organisers is the close links between suspicion and materiality, in a broad sense, including objects, buildings, the physical environment, but also sounds, vibrations, smells, etc. The matters of this world haunt us. They concern us. They compel us to engage with them. We are caught in their force fields. We use them, but at the same time, they dictate what is possible and impossible. They map out the boundaries of our world. They push and pull us in different directions. Their vectors become our own. They are in our dreams. They invade our living spaces. They have the power to betray us, to open our intimate spheres to the real or perceived agency of others. Interaction with objects and other aspects of the physical environment is an important arena of social, political and cultural articulation that accommodates experiences and sentiments that are otherwise too ambiguous and fleeting to be captured. Once manifested in the material world, otherwise vaporous sentiments of suspicion become graspable, at the level of everyday life as well as academic enquiry. When objectified, attached to a specific matter, doors are in turn opened to larger contexts as each object, site, sound, touch and smell speak about their place in the world.
With this call, we want to delve into the spaces of ambiguity, the moments of suspense while hunches are yet to solidify into tangible truths, and explore what happens if we study suspicion not simply as a lack of trust, but as a phenomenon in its own right. What would be its defining characteristics? Which forms would it assume? What would be its social, political, cultural, or affective dynamics? Is suspicion the lived truth of a world where social contracts have crumbled? Is it a state of mind, or a way of being-in-the-world? Is it an effect of affect, is it matter that matters, or is it not about what we feel at all, but about what we do – a set of prescribed practices in a precarious world? Is it in fact a social force that makes transactions possible?”
I will be presenting and running a workshop at the Civic Education Conference 2018 (CEC III) in Casablanca, Morroco, organised by the Networking Arab Civic Education (NACE), on 6 December, 10.30am, at the Idou Anfa hotel. The discussion will explore sociological-philosophical approaches to engendering civic education in the Arab public sphere.
This workshop will explore the philosopher Hannah Arendt’s themes of Vita Activa (Active Life) and Vita Contemplativa (Contemplative Life) and the ways it can be weaved into intellectual, research, and cultural endeavors within Egypt. The workshop is run by AUC HUSSLab’s postdoctoral fellow, Amro Ali, and Tahrir Lounge Goethe director, Mona Shahien. The event is free and open to the public, 6pm to 8pm, Wednesday, 28 November 2018, at AUC Tahrir campus, Hill House 602. Click here for the Facebook event.
The final Theatre of Thought lecture for 2018 will take place on 22 November 2018 at the Goethe-Institut Alexandria. This sociological-philosophy series will present: “Thinking in the Swarm: When Awareness and Knowledge Succumb to the Information Deluge.” Click here for the Facebook event.
The rise of the information age and digital revolution gave hope that immediate access to a plethora of sources, interactive and always visible, was within easy reach. In many respects, this was an encouraging development in places like Egypt, where libraries and access to books were rare or difficult to for the public. However, it came at a price. In 1996, British psychologist David Lewis coined the term Information Fatigue Syndrome (IFS) after noticing that workers who dealt with vast quantities of information were suffering from a weakening of their analytic capacity, attention deficits, inability to bear responsibility and traits of depression. It was unimaginable that this rare condition at the time would eventually engulf, in various degrees, the entire world. With the inundation of information, boiling matters down to their essence has become an arduous task.
The Theatre of Thought continues with the works by German-Korean philosopher Byung Chul-Han who argues that “on its own, a mass of information generates no truth. It sheds no light into the dark. The more information is set free, the more confusing and ghostly the world becomes. After a certain point, information ceases to be informative. It becomes deformative. Simply having more information and communication does not shed light on the world. Nor does transparency mean clairvoyance.” Thinking is underpinned by discernment, discrimination, selection, and even forgetfulness – qualities that are frequently bulldozed in the online world.
However, this is not about fleeing from the digital realm as much as it is to ask the question: How do we reconcile the digital order with the terrestrial order? The German theorist Carl Schmitt celebrated the earth for its solidity which enabled clear demarcations and distinctions in which character is formed. Whereas the digital order equals the “sea,” where “firm lines cannot be engraved”, that is to say, no character. The smooth open spaces of the digital medium are without end, but a better appreciation of the world of shadows with its nooks, corners, crannies, and alleys that not only filter and impede the information pollution and trolls, but allows slowness, reflection, and mediation processes back into the thinking fold and the realm of authenticity.
الوعي والمعرفة أمام طوفان المعلومات
لقد بعث عصر المعلومات والثورة الرقمية الأمل في النفوس بأن عالمًا من الموارد الوفيرة – المرئية منها والتفاعلية – قد أصبح بين أيدينا. وكان ذلك تطورا مشجِّعا من نواحٍ عِدة في دول مثل مصر، حيث كانت المكتبات قليلة وفرصة الجمهور في الحصول على الكتاب نادرة. لكن الثمن كان كبيرا. ففي عام 1996، خرج الإخصائي النفسي البريطاني ديفيد لويس بمصطلح “متلازمة الوهن المعلوماتي” (IFS)، بعد أن استرعى انتباهه أن العاملين الذين يتعاملون مع كم هائل من المعلومات يعانون من ضعف في القدرة التحليلية ونقص في الانتباه، وعدم القدرة على تحمل المسئولية، بالإضافة إلى ظهور أمارات الاكتئاب عليهم. ولم يخطر ببال أحد عندئذٍ أن تلك الحالة النادرة سوف تسري بين البشر في أنحاء العالم كافةً حتى تلتهمهم جميعا ولو بدرجات متفاوتة. ومع الإغراق المعلوماتي، صار تحليل أي مسألة من أجل الوصول إلى جوهرها مهمة شاقة.
يواصل مشروع التحرير لاونج جوته رحلته مع “مسرح الفكر” الذي يقدمه دكتور علم الاجتماع عمرو علي، بعنوان “الوعي والمعرفة أمام طوفان المعلومات”، وذلك بأعمال الفيلسوف الألماني-الكوري بيونج تشول هان، الذي يؤمن بأن كتلة المعلومات وحدها لا يمكن أن تتولد من بين طياتها الحقيقة؛ فهي لا تشع نورا يبدد الظلام، بل إن كل سيل من المعلومات ينطلق باعثاً معه حالة من التشويش يستحيل معها العالم عالماً للأشباح، وفي لحظة ما ستصبح المعلومات عاجزة عن تنويرنا أو إعلامنا بشيء؛ بل سوف تنتقص مما لدينا من معرفة؛ فالحصول على مزيد من المعلومات، وتحقيق مزيد من التواصل لا يجعل العالم أكثر وضوحا ولا استنارة، ولا الشفافية تعني وضوح الرؤية، حيث أن التفكير يرتكز على الإدراك والملاحظة والتمييز والانتقاء، بل وحتى على النسيان – تلك عمليات يتم تدميرها والإجهاز عليها في عالم الإنترنت.
كما تتناول الندوة فكرة أنه رغم كل ذلك، فالأمر لا يُعد دعوة للهروب من العالم الرقمي، بل دعوة لكي نسأل أنفسنا: كيف لنا أن نحقق التصالح بين النظام الرقمي، والنظام الأرضي؟ لقد عبر العالم الألماني كارل شميدت عن أن عظمة الأرض تكمن في صلابتها، حيث رُسمت الحدود وَوضَحت الفروق، فصنعت ملامح شخصيتها المتفردة، بينما يترامى النظام الرقمي “كبحر بلا شاطئ”، يستحيل فيه “أن تحفر خطًا واحدًا”، أي لا شخصية له على الإطلاق، كما أن الفضاءات الشاسعة الناعمة التي يفتحها الوسط الرقمي أمامنا لانهائية، لكن إذا تيسر لنا أن نتذوق عالم الظلال بأركانه وزواياه وشقوقه المظلمة وأزقته الضيقة، إذن لتمكننا من تنقية المعلومات وصد الملوث منها، وقطع الطريق على الغيلان القابعة فيها، بل ولحظينا ببعض الفرصة للتمهل، والتفكُّر، والتأمل -الشيء الذي سيعيدنا إلى مساحة التفكير وإلى عالم الأصالة.
تقام الندوة يوم الخميس 22 نوفمبر بمعهد جوته بالإسكندرية من الساعة 7 وحتى 9 مساءً، وتدير الندوة مؤسسة ومديرة مشروع التحرير لاونج جوته منى شاهين.
الدكتور عمرو علي هو دكتور علم الاجتماع في الجامعة الأمريكية بالقاهرة، محاضر في العديد من الجامعات والمعاهد في القاهرة والإسكندرية، تتناول أبحاثه دراسة المجتمعات، والحالة الإنسانية في ظل الاعتداء من قوى الاستهلاك العالمي والثقافة المادية، وآثر ذلك على الهوية، ومعنى المدينة والحداثة والمواطنة، حصل على الدكتوراه من جامعة سيدني وكانت الرسالة البحثية الخاصة به عن دور الخيال التاريخي في تشكيل الإسكندرية الحديثة ومواطنيها.”